The Boardroom Review and Dissent

A boardroom review is a process that allows a table to assess its performance in a comprehensive manner. It assists tables to identify weaknesses in their leadership relationships and the culture they operate in as well as other aspects of longevity. It also helps ensure that those who pay for table membership are equipped to perform their duties.

The research area is in development however there are several challenges. The current empirical evidence shows mixed results regarding how dissent can affect boards and their function. While some studies have reported positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear results, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) as well as mixed or non-significant results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats 2015; Minichilli et al. There is a 2012 study that shows) relationships between dissent and the task performance of a board.

Additionally, the existing research literature is not able to provide a more thorough theoretical understanding of what influences the dynamics of the dissent. To enhance the contextualization of this governance phenomenon, it is worthwhile for future research to create a more integrated theoretical approach. This could include the use https://www.boardroombook.com/what-is-a-do-questionnaire/ methods that are configurational (Federo and Saz-Carranza in 2018; Schiell, Lewellyn & Yan 2023) to help researchers understand how the attributes of boards, processes and contexts relate necessary and sufficient causality.

In the end, some studies employ an esoteric definition of discord, but don’t provide precise measurement methods. Therefore, these studies are prone to measurement errors. It would be beneficial to develop more robust methods to measure dissent for future studies.